Nor did I say that good practical reasoning requires intellectual sophistication. I cited Jonathan Haidt to say that this and intelligence just makes the rationalising of flawed intuitions more sophisticated.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I accept that desires different to my own are not necessarily less sophisticated or less mature. In fact, mine are not sophisticated. Very simple. I just want to address the concerns that people actually have and try to do so in a rational, evidence-based way that has appeal.
Show this thread -
I actually share concerns of the postmodern left about marginalisation of minority groups and of the premodern right about preserving cultural integrity. We discuss that here in the section called 'What the anti-modernists get right.'https://areomagazine.com/2017/08/22/a-manifesto-against-the-enemies-of-modernity/ …
Show this thread -
I am suspicious of sophistication as a concept. It can be applied to subjects which are naturally complex and require a great deal of breaking down and nuance but it can also apply to the process of obscuring the fact that something is absolute cobblers.
Show this thread -
I prefer to think in terms of depth of knowledge, complexity of issues, nuance of analysis than in terms of sophistication.
Show this thread -
Essentially, I think we should worry less about whether our understanding of society is sophisticated and more about whether it is rooted in reality.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I do appreciate the points you raise here, and I accept that you offer an interesting take on the Enlightenment and modernity...
-
'premodern right' - and although you share their concerns, calling them premodern was really my issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.