Don't have time to fully flesh it out, but the basic structure of the argument is: Logical evidence for at least a deistic "First Cause"; Logical evidence of mass revelation given the existence of a deistic First Cause; If those two are true, the truth of the text follows
-
-
Nobody ever tries to argue with me anymore and it bums me out because religion and politics aren my favorite things to discuss. That is, assuming whoever discussing it w/doesn’t just argue in circles and call me a heathen. So it goes.

-
All to the point of, I’m comfortable with my atheism, such that it is, that I don’t consider myself anti-theist a la Dawkins or Hitch if he were still with us (I wish). I respect others’ religiosity (w/exceptions) if it helps them be good people & good stewards of our world.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.