Yes ... but that's because the idea has been conclusively disproven. (Hence the lack of respect for flat-earthism). I don't think you can get to that type of conclusiveness in many cases of wrong ideas in philosophy/social sciences
-
-
Section 2 or 3?
-
I don't know. I searched 'evidence' and a big cluster came up.
-
Seems like you read 2. 3 is the core argument
-
I used to argue about this endlessly. Usually with Christians. I have lost all will to do so. Atheisting is very 2014.
-
I'm talking about religious tweeps and metaphysics coz you have reminded me I meant to. It is not about you, tho.
-
Helen, I'm deeply personally offended. Give me some time to process, dammit. Live look in:pic.twitter.com/6Mibccovxs
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Once my custody trial is done, we're going to have it out in Aero, you hear?
But no, it's not a scientific question at all, since science is the study of the existent universe and ...