This is what I mean. I doubt that Akiva really respects the idea that God does not exist. He means he respects my thinking and sincerity even tho he thinks it has led me to the wrong conclusion. He respects certain things about me whilst thinking I am wrong, not the wrongness.https://twitter.com/AkivaMCohen/status/950414792484950017 …
Yes, but we need to think about what we consider respect-worthy, whether it is the idea itself or the thinking that has gone into it. When a scientific consensus is overturned by new evidence, we don't stop respecting the previous work but we do stop respecting the idea.
-
-
Yes ... but that's because the idea has been conclusively disproven. (Hence the lack of respect for flat-earthism). I don't think you can get to that type of conclusiveness in many cases of wrong ideas in philosophy/social sciences
-
This is true. But I still don't respect ideas unless there is some evidence of their soundness. And God is not really a philosophical or social science issue. He either exists or not. That is a scientific question.
-
We really do need to have that debate we talked about a while back
Once my custody trial is done, we're going to have it out in Aero, you hear?
But no, it's not a scientific question at all, since science is the study of the existent universe and ... -
Well, if God didn't create it and isn't having any impact on it, we won't be able to discover him unless we can develop science to enable us to get to wherever he is.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.