Things have been going really good for you lately, haven't they James?
-
-
You missed the sarcasm
-
Or you did.
-
Correct response: "No LBGTQ people were consulted in this article. Do you have anything to add we may have missed? Any insights/feedback you want to share to improve it? Would you or anyone else like to collaborate?" Your response: "We speak for you. Your voice doesn't matter."
-
So would an article about white cishet men have to be written by white cishet men in order to be legitimate?
-
Since white cishet men command an overwhelming majority of the discourse already, their voices are not routinely drowned out by others speaking for them. Their voices are heard loud and clear 24/7. Did you actually think that was a good point or something?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
I'm a HUMAN who observes you have foul manners and nothing substantive to say. Your skin color, region of origin and sexual proclivities are irrelevant.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know, because that's a pillar all western jurisprudence is built upon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.