That article could have been written 100 times better by any trans person off the street and wouldn't have included your scaremongering about trans kids. You routinely position your assumptions as more authoritative than our lived experience and the affirming care model.https://twitter.com/HPluckrose/status/949831089329201153 …
-
-
Trans people are most affected by these issues and should be the *only* people centered in this conversation. You consistently position your prejudices as a common sense view when all they are is boring repetition of myths that perpetuate cissexism.
-
Deal with it. You live in a society with a range of people and they are all allowed to discuss gender identity. Just don't read it if it bores you. You are beginning to bore me now so either say something worthwhile or get muted.
-
So all you care about is speaking rather than having the slightest idea what you're speaking about and how it affects trans people's lives. So exactly as I thought, then.
-
Disagreeing with you does not indicate that we don't know what we are talking about. You are not God. Other views and principles exist and also facts which are independent of both of us.
-
Uncritically repeating waffling about 'bone density' is not a fact. Saying trans children receive gender-affirming surgery is not a fact. These are outright false. Your opinion on our gentials and who we should tell about them is not a fact and is actively dangerous to us.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.