Did you... did you read your own article? It cites liberalism's "aim to look past categories of race, gender and sexuality, thereby levelling the playing field and enabling all people to succeed by their own abilities".
-
-
-
Yes. Same thing as removing their social significance. Looking past them to people as individuals.
-
Yes, that's what I am saying you are saying. Why are you acting as if I'm saying something different?
-
What? Where? Don't answer. I'm very bored now. Muting this thread.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You strip some people - especially women - of their victim status... you evil being you... Advocating for equality and all that...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Attention may need to be given to those ID lenses to resolve social issues But I'd bet good money that non-prejudicial treatment of the individual generally with only the minimum-necessary attention paid to people's IDs is more likely to yield equality then the inverse scheme
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.