I think the idea is more that innately masculine men and boys socially inspire/pressure each other to harmful (to them and others, AKA toxic) heights of masculinity.
-
-
This is worrying tho. The idea that heights of masculinity are toxic rather than heroic or loving or hardworking or protective. Probably not what you meant. But I worry that 'very masculine' is increasingly seen as 'very bad.'
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't think the idea is that masculinity is inherently more toxic than femininity, or even innately bad at all. It's when taken to extremes, usually encouraged to those extremes by social pressure, that it's bad. Eg. bravery is good, too far it's foolishness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LaakesKaleb @HPluckrose and
Neither masculinity nor femininity is bad per se, but to suggest that they don't have any aspects which can be harmful seems silly to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Can't we just say that some negative traits are more common among one sex? This represents the reality of overlapping distributions of traits.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
We can, but I don't think it gets at the real cause as effectively as narrowing it down to, for example, boys trying to out alpha male eachother. It doesn't get to a solution, either, whereas trying to educate people about how social interactions impact them just might help.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
We can talk about intrasexual competition, sure. But we'd need to recognise all the implications of that. We don't need to go to original sin - it's in your very nature as a man/woman - to address negative behaviour. We've done that via Christianity for centuries.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.