Art has the potential to speak of anything and everything, just as science has. They are two sides of the same coin.
-
-
Replying to @DurinnMcFurren @HPluckrose
if you want to separate the two off entirely, one could say that neither does science alone have the power to discover facts without a spark of creativity
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Luke_Turner @DurinnMcFurren
But art doesn't own creativity. That is found in science too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @DurinnMcFurren
That's like saying science doesn't own method. My point is that the two are entirely intertwined, as they have historically always been.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Luke_Turner @DurinnMcFurren
To say this you'd need to show that creativity is a property of art rather than science.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Take the example of science fiction roadmapping both current technological developments and astronomical space projects..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
How is that in example of creativity belonging to art and not to science?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Creativity belongs in both art and science and art and science benefit from each others creativity, through the ages until today.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
That was the point of disagreement. You agree with me.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.