Again, which part of this is abstruse, incomprehensible or unusable? It's very plain, easy to understand English that has evidently been helpful to many. I've not attacked you in any way, but tried to engage. I don't see why you feel the need to be rude.http://www.metamodernism.com/2015/01/12/metamodernism-a-brief-introduction/ …
To say this you'd need to show that creativity is a property of art rather than science.
-
-
Take the example of science fiction roadmapping both current technological developments and astronomical space projects..
-
How is that in example of creativity belonging to art and not to science?
-
Creativity belongs in both art and science and art and science benefit from each others creativity, through the ages until today.
-
That was the point of disagreement. You agree with me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Creativity *is* art. This is the problem of trying to separate fields off, because one ends up going round in circles. It's all intertwined.
-
But you haven't considered the need to aardvark your wardrobe. If you did, you'd see quite clearly that art is a small village in France whilst science is a specific kind of small fishing boat found in Mauritius.
-
'pataphysics isn't my forte, but I'll take your word for it



-
I think you probably would. I'm going to have to mute, I'm afraid. I lack the willpower not to respond & this is too frustrating. Reasoned discussion isn't possible here. Enjoy your art tho.
-
wait, what? that was…er…all you there. I do hope you watch and enjoy that Bohm clip anyhow
-
This is the kind of garbage this dude churns out and labels art.pic.twitter.com/JfL0r6CvH7
-
thanks for the review Ian ★★☆☆☆
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.