Yes, exactly. This is why I moved on from Luke's proposition to Matthew d'Ancona's. He also wanted to appreciate objective truth and the need for narratives but to integrate them rather than swing between them. I called this a form of metamodernism that could work.
How has it made people value objective truth more? You were only saying a minute ago that things can be objective and subjective at the same time and its the interplay of this which is key so it seems unlikely you promoted science & reason.
-
-
For example, I've had (I feel important) discussions with senior figures in the media this year to express how it's their obligation to adjust their reporting of neo-Nazis attacking our work to reflect reality and not glorify them on their own terms. This has seen real progress.
-
I always promote science and reason. I'm not sure where you would get the impression that I've ever strived for anything else. I just happen to find those things the most wondrous and beautiful, and try to speak to that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
)