It's frightening that this needs to be explained again. There must be something intuitive about condemning people for the sins of their forefathers because it reoccurs so frequently.https://twitter.com/amyalkon/status/944356682548703232 …
-
-
How is it covered? In honest, comprehensive detail? Ditto, of course, slavery? There's no need for Germans not around at the time to feel responsible about the Nazis - but they do learn about them and are ruthlessly, rigorously honest with themselves about their nation's past.
-
Yes and that's what should happen. Surely you see the difference between covering what happened in rigorous, comprehensive detail and blaming people for it who weren't alive then? It's not difficult.
-
Yes I do. As I've said in every tweet in this exchange.
-
So what do you disagree with? Neither of us said history shouldn't be taught honestly, did we?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.