That doesn't make any sense. 'Kinds of pleasures that define them as a group?' No, the same rights as everybody else. I think we'd need good reason to ban group-specific pleasures, obviously. I defend the right of Christians to have churches even if no-one else wants them. https://twitter.com/bloatmarm/status/943357472672272386 …
Suppose fertility cultists were not allowed to have children. Would you organise in a group to demand the same rights to as everyone else? Or would you not bother because not everyone is a fertility cultist?
-
-
I would not organize political power to wield against everyone else for any reason but life and safety from harm. But no one is preventing black people from having children in America, unless you think family planning is equivalent. I don’t think it’s equivalent.
-
Again, this doesn't relate to anything I've said. You did for a minute respond appropriately but you've gone off again. I'm going to bed now anyway.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.