Because it is. If white evangelicals vote differently to white non-evangelicals, it suggests this is more to do with belief than skin colour.
-
-
-
Replying to @svenosaurus
To what? Clearly not to white people as those who didn't share the belief didn't vote for Moore. In the same way, we don't blame all brown people for Islamism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
That’s a bad analogy. Blaming conditions prevailing in many Muslim-majority countries would be much closer, and it would likely change “we don’t” to “we do”.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svenosaurus
Huh? I'm talking about in our countries. I do blame the prevailing conditions in America for white evangelical Christian hypocrisy. Why do you blame all brown people for Islamism?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
What in the world are you talking about??? What kind of vile question is that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svenosaurus
What didn't you understand? You said to change 'we don't' to 'we do' if we can blame prevailing conditions. Why? Why would that make it reasonable to blame a whole race for the criminal actions of different ideological zealots?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Blaming conditions is fundamentally different from - pretty much the opposite of - blaming the people. I’d think that was obvious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @svenosaurus
That doesn't make any sense, Sven. How does race come in then? Are we having a language barrier?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Possibly, as I am baffled by what you’re saying too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Jesus Christ. Let's never do this again.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.