That also implies that white supremacy isn’t just a freely made choice. It is hard to break out of a social mold if you’ve been thoroughly shaped in it.
-
-
It is an institutional problem. Race and religion are symptoms of those institutions, and can’t be viewed as exogenous factors. That is my position.
-
Race isn't a symptom of institutions. Its the colour of your skin depending on which part of the world your ancestors came from. How does this relate to the fact that whether or not whites voted for Moore depended on their religion?
-
Race categorization depends on society and its institutions.
-
Is this relevant here tho? Does America categorise evangelical whites as a different race to non-evangelical whites?
-
Obviously not, but I don’t get the logic of the question. What I’m saying is that both factors are historically conditioned. Is that even controversial?
-
Is it even relevant? No. I'm going to mute you now because I don't want to forget your name and try to talk to you again. You're either very stoned to the point where you can't follow a conversation or English is a second language. Either way, you're a time waster.
-
"Arabs cause terrorism" "Seems a bit strong" "Well, digging deeper: Arab Islamic fundamentalists cause terrorism" "Correlated but the ideology isn't unique to or ubiquitous among Arabs. Why say Arab at all if we can name the ideology itself?" "bla bla orthogonal/exogenous blabla"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.