I think ideas and values are more significant here because they are the things that motivate people and the things that can be changed.
To what? Clearly not to white people as those who didn't share the belief didn't vote for Moore. In the same way, we don't blame all brown people for Islamism.
-
-
That’s a bad analogy. Blaming conditions prevailing in many Muslim-majority countries would be much closer, and it would likely change “we don’t” to “we do”.
-
Huh? I'm talking about in our countries. I do blame the prevailing conditions in America for white evangelical Christian hypocrisy. Why do you blame all brown people for Islamism?
-
What in the world are you talking about??? What kind of vile question is that?
-
What didn't you understand? You said to change 'we don't' to 'we do' if we can blame prevailing conditions. Why? Why would that make it reasonable to blame a whole race for the criminal actions of different ideological zealots?
-
Blaming conditions is fundamentally different from - pretty much the opposite of - blaming the people. I’d think that was obvious.
-
That doesn't make any sense, Sven. How does race come in then? Are we having a language barrier?
-
Possibly, as I am baffled by what you’re saying too.
-
Jesus Christ. Let's never do this again.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.