Wearing one's clothes is not one's role, though.
-
-
-
Clothes are gendered and related to roles, yes. Bikinis are to be out, it seems. Seen as sexist because men don't wear them.
-
I'm referring to the Swedish law in the article. I doubt "stereotypical gender role" includes the wearing of clothes.
-
You don't think that was what was meant by 'displayed as a mere sex object'? I think the writer did as the picture is of a woman in a bikini. But hijabs are a gender specific modesty code. Gender-specific modesty codes are a gender role.
-
(quote)
#advertisements should not depict women or men as "mere sex objects", in a "stereotypical gender role" which is degrading, or in other ways which are "degrading and clearly sexist (/q) so no hijab or bikini ban. -
I don't know why you assume the last bit from the first.
-
I can imagine ads featuring women in such clothes that meet none of those criteria. Some ads may fall foul of them, but most certainly wouldn't.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Generally speaking
@EvaFernvall@CHSommers@mlowry banning something is rarely a good idea. It should be the last resort. Rather, we should try to help people to "have the courage to use their own understanding" http://www.columbia.edu/acis/ets/CCREAD/etscc/kant.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You know what's stereotypically feminine ? Having a baby. We might have a probleme on the long game here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One option might be to just stop giving a shit. Just a thought.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.