Those of us who consider ourselves liberal in the broadest sense of favouring equal rights, freedoms & opportunities must not allow social progress to be associated with the far-left any more than we should allow freedom of speech to be associated with the far-right.
-
-
Enlightenment liberals, classical liberals, universal liberals also want social progress. This is not owned by radical lefties.
-
Those liberals were once radicals
-
I'm not sure what you're arguing with. I'm saying there is a liberal left and a radical left now and the radicals don't own the aim for social progress. This is inherent in liberalism.
-
And identity politics is the logical outgrowth of the things modern liberals say they like: gay rights, diversity, feminism... So who is 'far left' and who is moderate? I find it hard to tell.
-
No. Identity politics was a reaction against universal liberalism. Liberals like gay rights & women's rights but diversity is loaded and nearly always used to mean diversity of identity rather than ideas. Not a fan of this usage.
-
So, do you not favour diversity of identity? And the idea that liberalism is universally applicable seems to me more radical than the idea that it isn't.
-
Diversity of identity is neutral provided equality of opportunity exists. Universal liberalism simply means applying liberal principles consistently & not being culturally or tribally relative.
-
Politics is relative. Things that work in one context might not work in another.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.