We need people to all sorts of things because if no-one did them it would be disastrous. That doesn't make them the most important thing a person can do.
-
-
Selective one. Subgroup extinction.
-
Well, sure, that happens all the time. No moral imperative to reproduce so your own culture/religion survives either.
-
Its immoral to wipe out a cultural subgroup. Its neutral for them to decide not to perpetuate themselves.
-
It's exactly the reverse. It can be perfectly moral to wipe out a cultural subgroup, e.g. Manson "family", while the fate of their ideology (e.g. self-destruction) is a verdict that history renders on its validity. You can think of history as an impartial metaethical judge.
-
I don't think this relates. They were not a subculture. This conversation has got silly. I can't be bothered to argue about it.
-
It's arguable what constitutes a subculture. The Nazis were undoubtedly a culture. I don't think this is silly at all. Might be uncomfortable for you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.