My Indian medical student friend just sent me this bit from his social medicine textbook. He's not very impressed. Also had a class once on how to make dead bodies feel better about being dead.pic.twitter.com/C50sntBoiG
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
No, humans could live with robot-farmers and among sewage. In fact, mechanized agriculture is already the norm in developed countries. Very few farmers needed. While in the 3rd world, many do live w/o sewage workers. Nobody could live, quite literally, without women having babies
We could live when technology can incubate babies too. Most women who have babies also do other important things. Women who don't have babies do too.
And as my friend pointed out, India is overpopulated. If some women decide not to have babies and focus on other important things, this would be a good thing.
One baby per woman would be enough to curtail population overgrowth. We can say having one baby is the most important thing. Subsequent babies are diminishing returns.
Or some women can have two and others can have none. Or no-one can have any. The worst that will happen is that humans will go extinct and that is unlikely but morally neutral.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.