Well, yes. Britain First make it harder to tackle the problem of Jihadism & Islamism & Islamic fundamentalism by randomly attacking all & any Muslims & anyone who looks a bit like they might be a Muslim. This isn't hard. https://twitter.com/Politikking/status/936367628326719489 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Because hurty words are so much more hateful than random killing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Vibeke_Hovgaard
That isn't what I said, is it? I said that they make people feel a justifiable need to defend Muslims as a marginalised group facing prejudice and from there refuse to acknowledge the problems within Islam which we really need to be doing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Vibeke_Hovgaard
If 'hurty words' made the problem better rather than worse, it could be worth it but it doesn't. It just makes more people confuse much-needed criticism of Islam with anti-Muslim bigotry and racism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Problem is that any criticism is shouted down as racist-bigot-fascist-nazi, however much needed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes. This is the problem I am talking about. When I said this:pic.twitter.com/loAYaMwWNR
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.