Academics who say postmodernism is dead are usually thinking too academically! They're either like theologians pointing to the original texts to defend them against how the religion has evolved and is being practiced and affecting real people (if they want to defend PoMo)
-
Show this thread
-
...or they are a little embarrassed about the excesses of postmodernism & want to distance themselves from it and claim they're doing something else now but they have actually internalised the key ideas abt discourses, cultural constructivism, knowledge and reason.
1 reply 2 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
I have got away from the original topic which was 'does this affect literary criticism today' and onto 'does this affect society today' because the latter is rather more important. It affects both tho.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Try bringing an empirical or scientific approach to bear on literary criticism in the realms of identity, power balance, individuality, knowledge and see how well it goes down. It doesn't. This book by
@jonathangottsch is excellent on that. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Gottschall-Jonathan-Literature-Humanities-Paperback/dp/B01DHEV1ZS/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1511852677&sr=8-8&keywords=jonathan+Gottschall …1 reply 6 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Academics who take issue with critics of postmodernism & say we are criticising a boogeyman need to look at what we are actually criticising and be honest about whether postmodernism & its evolution through critical theory & into activism had anything to do with it.
1 reply 4 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Areo will soon be publishing an extended version of my statement on this for the Battle of Ideas panel - The Academic Origins of Post-Truth Society. It explains better.
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Helen Pluckrose Retweeted
But this is not wrong: https://twitter.com/AaronRHanlon/status/935164685820878848 … People are more aware of postmodernism now in the Trump/Brexit era because its broken the bounds of academia and caused significant damage to the left thereby influencing the surge to the right.
Helen Pluckrose added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 3 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
It's not just annoying ppl in the humanities who'd like to be more rigorous & evidence-based. It evolved & entered leftist social conscience trading on the good name of the civil rights movement, feminism & Gay Pride & catastrophically undermined it.
1 reply 3 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
So yes, rightists will name it & attack it as all that is wrong with the left but they often misidentify it as an expansion of Marxism (rather than just as a replacement for Marxism) to conflate the two enemies - the identitarian left & economic left.
4 replies 3 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @HPluckrose
On this point, read the Bible of the Antifa movement to see that Marxism remains. (The few actual anarchists in the movement don’t realize the Marxists will see them “first against the wall when the revolution comes.”)https://the1a.org/shows/2017-08-21/the-antifa-handbook …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Maybe it mentions Marx, working class issues, economics etc in the full account. Doesn't come up in that extract and blurb.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Listen to the discussion and read his short book.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.