I think I have. You can argue that gender theory & critical race theory are not postmodern but the founders might disagree with you. Butler is Foucauldian. Crenshawe was explicit about the influence of PoMo on her work.https://twitter.com/Daniel_Rivieria/status/935408656736067585 …
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Okay sure. But in one way or less they theory of the social construction of race isn't really ignoring facts but reinterpreting them. Same with gender theory not ignoring biological sex. Unless you mean someone like Riley Dennis. Who I support regardless of small disagreement.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Daniel_Rivieria
For me, the problem is more about privileging group identity above individuality & shared humanity & reading people as mediated through discourses of power and systems of privilege which reduces them to stereotypes.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I like this response thanks it gives me a lot to think about. It does make a lot more sense. Although I would also argue that society and environment are the primary things that dictate any major historical impact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Daniel_Rivieria
And the zeitgeist changed. Society changed. Postmodernism was influential.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I still think you've moved postmodernism to mean more than it really does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If anything, I've used it to mean less than it does. It was a huge phenomenon. I focus only a few persistent ideas & the way they have evolved through critical theory and into activism and far-left politics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.