Work better than uncircumcised in what way?
And wouldn't it? Improve matters? If foreskin is a problem for some and not for others, there's clearly variation which should be subject to natural selection, no?
-
-
Via which gradual path should foreskin disappear? If I'm not mistaken, it's formed together with vital parts of the penis in embryo. Beneficial variations in foreskin would therefore be highly likely to cause detrimental changes in the other parts.
-
The same as with other vestigial parts. I've just been reading and apparently, rather than shrinking, evolution made it grow. Considered beneficial for reproduction: http://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=15 …
-
the human prepuce is not "vestigial" but is, in fact, an evolutionary advancement over the prepuce of other primates. This is most clearly seen in the evolutionary increase in corpuscular innervation of the human prepuce...
-
...and the concomitant decrease in corpuscular receptors of the human glans relative to the innervation of the prepuce and glans of lower primates." http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.