Yes, Harris! And Dawkins! And Dennett! And Boghossian. And Sapalsky. And Shultz. And Gottschall. Too many! https://twitter.com/GodDoesnt/status/930172497894563841 …
Who? When? They make their arguments and then other people can respond. And they respond to each other in disagreement.
-
-
None of them have anything definitive to say about God, free will or consciousness and yet they and their acolytes act as if they do. Those blind spots aside, their real strength, which I appreciate, is the constant fine tuning of the arguments within their fields of inquiry.
-
Well, obviously, we all think people we disagree with have blind spots but that is what discussion and argument is for.
-
True, but Dennett refers to himself and those who are likeminded as ‘Brights’ and Dawkins regards teaching the Bible to children as a form of child abuse. Honestly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.