I don't actually see a moral imperative to perpetuate the species, let alone my own race, culture, nationality.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @GlasgowAlbum
Wait.. is anyone claiming there is a moral imperative to squeeze out sprogs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VniVdiChestnuts @GlasgowAlbum
Yes! Social conservatives generally. Those who talk of 'white genocide' particularly.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @VniVdiChestnuts @GlasgowAlbum
I don't mean all social conservatives but when you find people lamenting low birthrates & blaming a sexual revolution and feminism, they are social conservatives.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @GlasgowAlbum
In my experience there tends to be a racial aspect to this. These people would be happy with certain races having low birth rates.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VniVdiChestnuts @GlasgowAlbum
Very often, yes, but not always and this is also a concern of non-white, often religious, social conservatives
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Muslims have often argued this to me, for example, because of a culture in which having children and continuing family line is seen as very important in itself. They don't usually racialise this or make it unique to Muslims.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @VniVdiChestnuts
But of course there are Muslim (and other) cultures which value FGM, but that practice is deeply repugnant to most Muslims from other cultures.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is a different issue tho. Socially conservative ideas abt family correlate with both religion & Asian/Middle Eastern culture. In fact, its Westerners who are unusual in departing from this.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.