I have sorted him out. I am pretty sure one is true and one is not. https://twitter.com/Wandering_Raven/status/929435827784044545 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
If you are talking about the difference between Newtonian mechanics and the story of Adam and Eve, you're talking about entirely different types of "truth".
@jordanbpeterson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenedictMPWhite @jordanbpeterson
I'm denying that the latter is true at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jordanbpeterson
Ah. OK. You're wrong, but never mind.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenedictMPWhite @jordanbpeterson
So postmodernists keep telling me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jordanbpeterson
Post modernism is just wrong and has no foundation. Also they claim it's true in the former scientific sense rather than the theological sense.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenedictMPWhite @jordanbpeterson
It has quite a lot in common with religion. I use it to study Christian narratives.https://www.academia.edu/30784957/_Challendge_to_Your_Selves_no_Sovraigntie_Aemilia_Lanyer_Saint_Monica_Christian_Feminine_Virtue_and_its_Challenge_to_the_Patriarchal_Symbolic_Order …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @jordanbpeterson
I'd agree post modernism is a religion, but unlike other religions, it has no foundation over time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But it calls on the same concepts and sometimes specifically cites them. See, for example, Kristeva's symbolic and semiotic and Augustine's Sapientia and Scientia or Irigaray's use of the Double Syntax to regain prelapsarian knowledge.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
