I have sorted him out. I am pretty sure one is true and one is not. https://twitter.com/Wandering_Raven/status/929435827784044545 …
-
-
Post modernism is just wrong and has no foundation. Also they claim it's true in the former scientific sense rather than the theological sense.
-
It has quite a lot in common with religion. I use it to study Christian narratives.https://www.academia.edu/30784957/_Challendge_to_Your_Selves_no_Sovraigntie_Aemilia_Lanyer_Saint_Monica_Christian_Feminine_Virtue_and_its_Challenge_to_the_Patriarchal_Symbolic_Order …
-
I'd agree post modernism is a religion, but unlike other religions, it has no foundation over time.
-
But it calls on the same concepts and sometimes specifically cites them. See, for example, Kristeva's symbolic and semiotic and Augustine's Sapientia and Scientia or Irigaray's use of the Double Syntax to regain prelapsarian knowledge.
-
Is that available in English?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.