I've seen more than those 5 interviews. He states all the time what he believes: there are empirical facts (science) and there are intangible truths associated with how to be (morality). An example in the Harris podcast is when he argued for truths in stories or literature.
-
-
Their genes and their myths tell different stories. Postmodernists have argued that the myth is true because truth is subjective, not objective. Peterson argues very similarly but adds survival to the mix.
-
Peterson would not argue that their genes aren't real. Have you seen him argue FOR biology? Have you seen him warn against "gender studies" and it's anti-science? I really do think you don't know much about him beyond a few interviews. The interviews are just a small piece.
-
He would argue that both things were true at the same time, thereby ignoring the rule of non-contradiction. Then he'd complain about postmodernists.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You cannot have a functioning society without a common narrative. It's absurd to think otherwise. Change the narrative, you change society. We're seeing it today with the rise and social impact of anti-white narratives.
-
This is a different argument.
-
No, it isn't. I literally repeated myself.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.