It's not the take anyone is disagreeing with tho. We disagree that 'truth' is defined by assistance in survival rather than what is objectively true whether we believe it or not, whether it helps or not.
He would say that if it aided our survival to believe the untrue thing, it is a pragmatic truth. He's very clear on this.
-
-
It would be pragmatically true. I'm not sure what the argument is there.
-
That this is not objective truth and therefore the claim that Peterson rejects objective truth is justified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or as (?) Plato put it, a "noble lie".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.