I've seen more than those 5 interviews. He states all the time what he believes: there are empirical facts (science) and there are intangible truths associated with how to be (morality). An example in the Harris podcast is when he argued for truths in stories or literature.
-
-
What do you perceive to be the difference between his understanding of truth and Sam Harris' then?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Harris is strictly an empiricist to the point where he's entirely opposed to any sort of non-empirical conclusions as he associated them with theology. Peterson is a clinical psychologist. He lives in a world where empirical research mixes with human psychology to provide insight
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
On the subject of what is true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm not sure what's unclear. Harris is strictly empirical and rejects non-empirical notions of truth. Peterson is empirical while accepting that non-empirical notions of truth exist.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It seems the difference is sharper. Both accept that such "notions" exist. Harris denies they have any basis in reality, Peterson doesn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That does not make sense. You can't accept non-empirical truth and then claim the concept has no basis in reality.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can accept that people have "notions" of truth: "The world is full of demi-gods and fairies" without those notions being empirically true.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's not what we're talking about. We're taking about the agreement of what is true. Harris cannot agree that there is non-empirical truth then say non-empirical truth has no basis in reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Simply fixed because he wouldn't call it 'truth'. He'd say there are non-substantiated beliefs and there are truths. The postmodernists conflate these into different kinds of truths and ways of knowing & so does Peterson. It's not helpful.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
This is what is usually referred to as denying the objective nature of truth.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.