Everyone says that. It's not the point of contention.
-
-
As Rogan pointed out, you don't have to say something becomes true because it is a dominant and helpful narrative. You can say 'This is a dominant and helpful narrative which isn't actually true.' Peterson rejected that.
-
I picked that example at random, btw. I don't think making such a huge mistake is or could be helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see any reason to think Peterson would agree with you here. He wouldn't argue the fact of 21% v. 5%. He may ask where the people were polled. If they're in a major city, then their perception may be accurate. I'm thinking you don't really understand his position at all.
-
He would say that if it aided our survival to believe the untrue thing, it is a pragmatic truth. He's very clear on this.
-
It would be pragmatically true. I'm not sure what the argument is there.
-
That this is not objective truth and therefore the claim that Peterson rejects objective truth is justified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.