in her intro she defines out anyone who would disagree w/her thesis.it's not only not representative--it's bad data gathering. try again pls
-
-
sorry had to block that guy—random accusations of ableism? hard pass. one way to PhDwash an agenda is to create a survey of those who are
-
preordained to have a viewpoint that will support post-publishing points-of-view that favor a given outcome. this kind of “work” has become
-
part and parcel of right wing agenda pushing for the past 30 years (it’s an industry!)and this strikes me as an example of this type of work
-
maybe i’m wrong! but dawkins’ essentially took ur work and said “see! academia is stultifying and PC is ruining everything” which is what he
-
already believes. and maybe you do too? that’s all i’m saying. best of luck!
-
I'm aware of the problem, yes. It's hardly a secret. I want to fix it because I value the humanities and social sciences. I wanted to find women to share their experiences of it.
-
And see how it was affecting lives and careers below the radar. This is not unusual and I doubt you'd be complaining if it was a survey of women experiencing sexual harassment or something & demanding why women who don't experience it or don't think its a problem weren't included
-
you know what i wouldn’t do? i wouldn’t reach out to those who already said they’ve been sexually harassed and then make universalist claims
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.