No. Ask dog lovers what precise problems they have as dog-lovers. Don't include people who don't like or are indifferent to dogs.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @robogreen and
I *wasn't* testing to see how many ppl felt they had to censor non-intersectional views. I was finding out why those who do do feel the need
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @robogreen and
Some surveys look at how many people are experiencing a problem, others ask those who are about the problems they are experiencing.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
i guess.the fault here lies with
@RichardDawkins exceedingly misleading tweet, or rather his tendentious one.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, he stated the group I was looking at too. A survey of those women, not all women.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
i give up. willful or no, this is all really lame. i come from a family of PhDs and i'm pretty sure none of them would do any of this.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm glad to hear it. This doesn't mean it isn't happening. I've shown you the high profile cases & surveyed women who are self-censoring.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @robogreen and
He's attempting to
#mansplain your own article to you.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paulmassonbrand @HPluckrose and
gross. no. i’m attempting to parse why anyone would bother to do a survey like this, when the outcome is preordained. we know the answer...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robogreen @HPluckrose and
She told you twice already that it's surveying WHY people self censor, not IF they self censor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And he said he didn't believe it so I'm not sure how he can both find it incredible and also know what it would find. I expected some of it but there were some surprises. More radfems, fewer conservatives, for example.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.