No, we don't. And women not underrepresented in all areas of STEM. Doesn't matter if we're not drawn to same things as men in same numbers
-
-
There are so many global challenges facing us and women can contribute a lot to STEM yet only comprise 24% of roles.
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Well, until there aren't enough men who *want* to do it, I see no need for women to stop doing what interests them. For me, it's history.
1 reply 1 retweet 32 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MiriamMakEnergy and
I don't think women can contribute anything that men can't by virtue of genitalia or gender identity.
3 replies 2 retweets 38 likes -
That's unfortunate you feel that way about women. I think women can add a new dimension to things.
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
How?
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
With proper training, women bring a fresh perspective. Some also believe in biological or social differences that benefit business.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
What fresh perspectives? Science tries to reduce the impact of perspectives (bias) so it can get at what is true.
1 reply 3 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @MiriamMakEnergy and
We don't want male and female perspectives on, say, physics. We want to reduce such human error as much as possible & find out what's true.
1 reply 3 retweets 36 likes -
Back to the original problem: Women are getting less money in general but getting ~ same money for comparable work. How to solve?
9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Why assume there's something to solve? If women want to prioritise earnings, they can. Why should we?There is more to life. Like enjoying it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.