I think women have, can &will bring a lot to STEM including (I hope) my daughter who intends to go into it. But not by virtue of being womenhttps://twitter.com/MiriamMakEnergy/status/925772049783586817 …
-
-
Science has been pretty good at formulating ways to discover & correct human error caused by bias.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This contradicts the claim that women are underrepresented in programming b/c of different preferences (people vs things) on average, no?
-
That's a different thing, yes.
-
If there are on average differences in systematizing vs. empathizing, then on average adding women would likely add new dimensions, no?
-
Not to science, no. There are right and wrong answers.
-
How about tech, though?
-
How about it? You can try empathising with it but I think you still have to follow it's programming to make it work.
-
I'm talking about designing things that people are going to use. There isn't one correct answer, but lots of different possibilities. For
-
example, the cyber security field is kind of hamstrung by the number of experts who are indifferent to the needs of the vast majority of
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Bingo! Scientists work hard to ensure they are observers not participants
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Diff interests lead to diff avenues being explored by induals. The more science is done the less this has impact on overall knowledge base.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.