Never seen anyone make that argument.
*I* am saying that argument doesn't work because it doesn't stand up if applied to anything else. That's not the justification.
-
-
It doesn't need to stand up when applied to everything else. It's a response to people who *defend* the striking of children
-
It does if you make 'coz you wouldn't do it to adults' the justification for not smacking children rather than that smacking itself is wrong
-
What? Sorry. I'm not understanding you and need to go to bed.
-
I know you're not!I can't be any more clear.I'd only be repeating myself. Don't know why you bit my head off for saying I need to go to bed!
-
Obviously, because it was preceded by the 'I don't understand you.' Don't be disingenuous, please.
-
Also, I understand you perfectly. You're communicating clearly. I disagree with you.
-
Either way, this is the most boring and pedantic Twitter convo I've had in some time.
-
Yes! And I made a rule not to keep wasting my time with them,No-one says that. Yes, they do. I say that. I don't understand. I do understand
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They need to argue that smacking is different to other forms of discipline & say why.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.