Science is a method for discovering facts. No faith required. Working hypotheses, yes. Yes, evil can be religious or secular in motivation.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PastorPhilBCC
Said by someone without a belief in a personal god. I am much more interested in religion than science but don't think ppl need both.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
No you don't need to believe in a personal God to be a good person. I just think HE invented goodness.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PastorPhilBCC
Yes, I know you do. I think our conception of it evolved because it helped us survive as social mammals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
"Evolved," that would require "faith" I don't have enough of.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PastorPhilBCC
:-o You don't accept evolution?! I thought you were a pro-science Christian!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I don't believe in evolution as the source of origin. Could there be evolution after creation in my view? Sure
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PastorPhilBCC
Evolution doesn't address origins, only development.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Please give me chapter & verse on that. U saying evolution's compatible with "in the beginning God created ...?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not with a literal reading of genesis, no!. But it doesn't address how life began. Only how it developed.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
Interesting point of view. I'll ponder it & let it be the last word ... for now. Thanks for engaging.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.