It;s not my way. I am not the one saying that we shouldn't criticise sets of ideas if we don't like them.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I understand that. I am saying that you are merely pointing out your disagreement with their way of classifying actions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I know I am. That is explicitly what I am doing. Disagreeing with their way of classifying actions. I said so quite clearly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Ok. My point was that as long as they don't agree with your suggested classification, they can continue to live without contradictions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
So it's not a surprise, not hypocrisy, not a logical failure. It is merely the human tendency to aim for local consistency.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
I don't know what you mean. I don't think I can explain any more clearly but I will try.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'm saying consistency is subjective due to independent rationalizing conceptions. Pointing out inconsistencies is inherently difficult.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
You can still try, but it's not as simple as suggesting a classification that introduces a contradiction by making it visible.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Honestly, that's fine. If a person continues to insist that its criticising ideas which is bad rather than specific ideas, I can walk away.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Try to have a conversation with someone who is a bit more aware of what the specific issue is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.