Also, I'm prepared to defend the position that abandoning religion for secularism is a mark of progress. Is this problematic now? Tough.https://twitter.com/IonaItalia/status/922850126032396289 …
Really? You've not heard arguments that religions are not true and that societies which separate church & state are better for human rights?
-
-
Sure I have. But 1) "separation of church & state" /= "abandoning religion for secularism"
-
The person I am quoting falsely made those antonyms, yes. You can be a secularist and still have a religion.
-
I assume she meant making religion the guiding force of a society/person vs centring the non-religious aspects.
-
seemed to me to be more person than society, but that's a fair reading
-
'Secularism' really is societal rather than personal but I suspect she meant 'prioritising things that don't adhere to religious teachings'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.