I'm not suggesting needing professional qualifications. Just having informed yourself enough to feel able to have an opinion.
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose @amyalkon
Fair enough. I think, on climate change, one by now has to strain to avoid absorbing necessary evidence to abandon notion it's just 50-50.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @amyalkon
I think it's always wise to refer to a scientific consensus when one exists.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I will say I don't understand the Big Bang well enough to argue about it if asked to do so. This doesn't imply there's no consensus.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @amyalkon
Yes. I suppose there's an important difference btwn issues that do & don't have massive long-term implications for human (& other) welfare.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think very fact that there are political factions denying ACC is function of fact it affects human interests. No radio interviewer ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
... wd ask non-expert whether new evidence of gravity waves seems solid. But, by same token, no monied interests r trying to discredit it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Friedmanzone @amyalkon
Most often people want me to have an opinion on Israel/Palestine & that is rather an important issue but I just haven't researched it.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's bad, Helen.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Sevens_2 @HPluckrose and
This man informing woman thing, I kinda like it. Why don't men do it more often?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Ah, flirting.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.