It only undermines trust, not respect.
-
-
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
It draws attention to unspoken, concealed premises and makes it possible to question them and question the validity of thought based on them
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
So you could argue that it fits right in with reason and science, because arguments with explicit premises are more reliable
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
It in general: maybe not. But e.g. Butler analysing the feminist political subject did a pretty good job at it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer
Butler did? Did she not say the subject is in always in state of flux and then essentially leave us in the mess?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
I'd say the mess was there before. She just pointed at it. It's not surprising if the land of unspoken premises tends to be incoherent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
Showing contradictions (e.g. in the White woman as a subject of liberation) shouldn't undermine respect for values.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
It might be helpful to turn the question around and ask how respect for science could be undermined, if you tried really hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @fronxer @HPluckrose
Money could play a role, conflicts of interest, lack of control, evidence of unethical investment, …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh, how science itself could be undermined and be unworthy of respect? It could stop sciencing properly & become motivated by ideology/money
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.