That's about subjective experience. We all know that exists.
Yes. That's what I'd want to do. But no-one can challenge them if they can't hear them, can they? Wasted opportunity.
-
-
The history of effective free expression is often passionate/loud: - Boston Tea Party - modern Tea Party - Congress town halls (2009, 2017)
-
I'm not suggesting otherwise. We have a long history of yelling over ideas we don't like rather than engaging them. Let's do better.
-
Speech has 2 roles: - deliberation (Senate at best, courts, universities) - engaged/passionate/organizing (effective protests, universities)
-
Speech has many roles.I support ppl's right to shout &scream abt ideas they don't like as long as they don't prevent me from discussing them
-
Are we really at risk of ideas not being discussed in US or UK? If so, seems real cause is power of elites/classes with historical power.
-
Yes. Certain ideas get shouted down, censored, punished. Yes, there is evidence that this is coming from elite universities.
-
Maybe those ideas are simply losing in the free market of ideas. And ideas like intersectionality are winning.
-
And we're imagining the obstructive protests, no platforming, calls for firing, justification of violence?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.