The legal definition of assault does not account for severity. That distinction is made on a case-by-case basis according to type.
You think he's denying what the law says rather than making arguments for what should count as assault or you're just pretending to?
-
-
I'm not pretending anything. He made explicit assertions, to which I'm disagreeing:pic.twitter.com/LIZneABWSi
-
U are reading this, for some reason, as meaning 'according to the laws of Canada' rather than an argument for what should constitute assault
-
I'm reading his words at face value. "It's not assault" leaves little room for misinterpretation...
-
You just gave two 'In the legislation of Canada' and 'In his own argument.' I am out. This is not a coherent conversation.
-
No, I just disagree with his EXPLICIT assertion that grabbing someone's ass without consent is not or should not be considered assault.
-
He explicitly said 'it is not assault' - I gave evidence (law) that it is indeed assault. He explicitly said 'it shouldn't be' - I disagree.
-
Two assertions. Two refutations. Not confusing at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.