As stated previously, legal definition of assault covers all forms, and punishments vary depending on type/severity.
-
-
-
While James incorrectly argues that 'it's not assault', when he should be saying 'it shouldn't be assault', the law is what it is.
-
What? Is this just a pick at words? How tedious.
-
Not exactly. He is asserting that 'x is not assault', when all legal definitions state otherwise. He's objectively wrong.
-
I think you've missed the intended meaning.
-
I don't think I have. I think he does believe grabbing someone's ass without consent should not be considered assault.
-
So where does 'He's saying the laws of Canada' don't allow for prosecution under it?' You're making no sense. I'm out now.
-
I didn't say he said the law doesn't allow for prosecution. He's using a legal term and saying something is not <legal term>, when it is.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.