You can't understand the current paranoia around language & focus on structures of privilege without understanding certain PoMo ideas.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
I believe that understanding could and would have come about with very little help from postmodernist theory
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @guymit
Hmm? You think the shift to thinking in this way about social reality being constructed by language wld have arisen in another form?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @guymit
We've always had the tendency to think we can create reality with our stories but this is specific development in leftist civil rights ideas
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Yes, but civil rightists’ achievements owe very little to postmodern theory, which has lamely toddled after events and muddied the waters
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @guymit
I agree.What I will argue in my talk on this was that PoMo ideas traded on the good name of civil rights & presented itself as the next step
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @guymit
And believed it was. This is relativism + scepticism abt objective truth + paranoia abt language (all old) applied to new phenomenon.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @guymit
The Battle of Ideas at the Barbican on the 28th of October. 'The Academic Roots of Post-Truth Society' is my panel.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose
Sounds very interesting. I don’t think you NEED to read Ray Tallis, but I swear you would LOVE his work!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Replying to @HPluckrose
A Green literary theorist once had to remind her audience that it was not language hat had a hole in its ozone layer!
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.