No, he's deliberately obscuring the definition of truth so he can cash out his beliefs about God and his chosen moral framework.
-
-
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @GodDoesnt and
Indeed. He may be suggesting that in the real world there are more important things than true belief.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellydog67 @Intrinsic29 and
And that would be absolutely fine because at least then he'd be acknowledging that truth exists & is separate from myths.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
Suppose he knows this. What position should he take to encourage his desired world? The Tree of Knowledge is not that of Life.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wellydog67 @Intrinsic29 and
He must do what he thinks best. Those of us who think we need to hold on to objective truth to get past PoMo & post-truth will criticise it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HPluckrose @wellydog67 and
JBP's point is that 'objective truth' is a recent phenomena, not the same as saying it's arbitrarily constructed a la PoMo darlings...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theasefountain @wellydog67 and
OK, I asked you nicely several times to stop evangelising & keep your beliefs to yourself because I have had enough. It didn't work.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @wellydog67 and
I hope we can remain Twit friends and be civil because my only interest is in good debate and seeking solutions. Un abrazo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @theasefountain @wellydog67 and
Yes, OK, but I don't want to hear any more about Being & other Peterson views. They bore me & I don't find them worthwhile. You still can.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We good.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.