I think his view is consonant with Nietzsche’s, that the truth isn’t necessarily what is good for us, and may require careful packaging.
I'm very pleased to hear you say so but please recognise that others think he is describing reality & he says he is.pic.twitter.com/rxuS3edDB1
-
-
...then no amount of science will help you. It's a diff way of thinking about life. It's not 'science, but wrong!' It's something else...
-
I knew that before the first time you told me. We agree on what he is doing but disagree on whether it is worthwhile.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Science is 'what works, what's true' Being is the same but a different take. If your being is wrong (ie selfish, arrogant, resentful)...
-
I knew that before the first time you told me. We agree on what he is doing but disagree on whether it is worthwhile.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He's talking about reality of Being. Which includes but doesn't deny scientific reality.
-
I knew that before the first time you told me. We agree on what he is doing but disagree on whether it is worthwhile.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t know. But It may be that obfuscation is by far the better alternative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.