No. You seem to be entirely reliant upon the State to protect you. I am saying that this is both unmanly and imprudent.
-
-
On the state?! Was Kevin suggesting state should protect him from people disagreeing with him? No. Why does this require state or violence?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
The original point made by Peterson was that men are usually polite to one another due to the potential for violence. 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellydog67 @HPluckrose and
2/ No one said that violence was an argument, this was the misunderstanding on the part of Kevin, and now apparently by you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The potential for violence if words cross a line. Someone would have to hit first. Someone would have to be violent coz didn't like words
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
These are kindergarten values, nothing to do with the real world
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As opposed to throwing little baby fits and fighting people over words. May want to quit while you're behind.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Is everybody else here American? Brits have this perception of Americans as having the healthiest attitude to free exchange of ideas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HPluckrose @Intrinsic29 and
Suddenly speech we don't like is unendurable & people must be fired or punched for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m with you, Ms. Pluckrose, as is Dr Peterson.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK. I accept you read this as him simply observing that there is always a threat of violence behind men's speech rather than approving it
-
-
Thank you Ms. Primrose, I am greatly relieved :)
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.