Oh please. The willingness to try and physically hurt people for disagreeing with you makes you a thug, not someone I'd respect.
-
-
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @GodDoesnt
Yes, and I hope you never meet someone who doesn’t give the tiniest shit what you want, and just takes everything you have.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @wellydog67 @GodDoesnt
Uh, yeah, so do I, obviously. Do you imagine this statement represents a good argument?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @GodDoesnt
Do you imagine this puerile response constitutes a valid critique?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellydog67 @GodDoesnt
Yes. As does the response that followed it. Pointing out that some idiot may mug me some day isn't an argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Intrinsic29 @GodDoesnt
No. You seem to be entirely reliant upon the State to protect you. I am saying that this is both unmanly and imprudent.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
On the state?! Was Kevin suggesting state should protect him from people disagreeing with him? No. Why does this require state or violence?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
The original point made by Peterson was that men are usually polite to one another due to the potential for violence. 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wellydog67 @HPluckrose and
2/ No one said that violence was an argument, this was the misunderstanding on the part of Kevin, and now apparently by you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The potential for violence if words cross a line. Someone would have to hit first. Someone would have to be violent coz didn't like words
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
In this case, it was forming a movement and calling people Nazis. In other cases, its OK to punch ppl for saying Nazi things. Its pathetic
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.